Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] vs Ryan Nijboer [395th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W L W
Form
W W W L L L W L W LH2H: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Nijboer
They have played 3 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Nijboer winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Nijboer was at the Netherlands F6 (Haren), 30-08-2018, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Ryan Nijboer | 0 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (10-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 89 | Ranking | 395 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 371 |
| 29 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 3 |
| 62% (362-225) | Career Total W/L | 56% (265-205) |
| $3,420,360 | Career Prize Money | $5,735 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Nijboer H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
73 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
4
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
5
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Nijboer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:56:0 | Average Match Time | 2:56:0 |
| 66% (73/111) | 1st Serve % | 59% (66/111) |
| 66% (48/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (46/66) |
| 53% (20/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (21/45) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 40% (44/111) | Return Points Win % | 39% (43/111) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Nijboer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 43.6% of points on their second serve, while Nijboer has won 43.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 48.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.55% and 28.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 51.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 52.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 51.47% of matches played (W/L 35/ 33), with Nijboer winning 56.38% (W/L 53/ 41) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 97/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 22% (W/L 5/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 24/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Nijboer being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Nijboer winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Nijboer was at the Netherlands F6 (Haren), 30-08-2018, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Nijboer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 147.03 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 232.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 30.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 37.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ryan Nijboer Best Odds For The Match
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Ryan Nijboer
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Ryan Nijboer
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Ryan Nijboer
56%
(
74 of
131)
1st Serve %
53%
(
59 of
112)
1
Aces
5
13
Double Faults
7
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Ryan Nijboer
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Ghetu
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Forti
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zandschulp vs Nijboer?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Nijboer is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (362/225) | Win/Loss | 56% (265/205) |
| 58% (824/587) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (614/484) |
| 53% (7072/6249) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5397/4806) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2868 | Aces Total | 1083 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2129 | Total Double Faults | 1607 |
| 1:35:31 | Average Match Time | 1:33:13 |
| 178.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 241.87 |
| 62% (23889/38801) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17782/28157) |
| 71% (17067/23889) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11878/17782) |
| 48% (7187/14915) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4768/10375) |
| 43% (1769/4107) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1435/3157) |
| 41% (16274/40003) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12190/28655) |
| 63% (335/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (259/459) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 56% (100/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (58/126) |
| 58% (112/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (73/157) |
| 89% (341/302) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (278/229) |
| 11% (341/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (278/49) |
| 24% (244/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (192/36) |
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Nijboer
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
View full predicted draw for Zandschulp in Munich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
